TUMBLR

Monday, December 23, 2019

Research methodology

DETAILED NOTE
Sources for Problem Selection 
As noted above, it is important that a researchable area has been selected first before locating a research problem or research topic. Four important sources which can facilitate this have been underlined by Koul (2007) discussed as follows.
Professional Literature
One needs to locate the most authentic professional literature in one’s discipline and the area of research. In every discipline and/or area of research, the experienced professors and researchers are aware of the most authentic reference and research literature, and the sources of their availability. These include reference work/books; experiential notes available as monographs or occasional papers or simply teacher notes available at university website; research work published in refereed journals, available as OER, or as research monograph, and problem-based accounts written by teachers, researchers, students, graduates, among others and available as blogs, web postings or experiencial papers published in journals and newspapers. The major sources of such literature include various Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Survey of Educational Research (CASE, MSU/NCERT), Dissertation Abstracts, OER Search Engines. Some of the sites for authentic OER include those of UNESCO and MERLOT, among others. A survey of these literature facilitates location of ‘suggestions for further research’ in those literature which can further ignite the mind of the researcher to ponder over possible research problem and research title. While examining the related research studies, the researcher may also locate and jot down the limitations of research design, sampling procedure as also any contradictory findings which necessitate to re-examine the phenomenon/research problem in different contexts.
Theories
While examining the related and authentic reference works, the researcher may examine description and analysis of theoretical and/or conceptual frameworks which could have been drawn from cognate disciplines of philosophy, psychology, sociology, and the field of education itself. These theoretical frameworks may also suggest and motivate the researcher to proceed exploration of a particular variable or problem area.
Personal Experience
It is all the more essential that the researcher interacts with teachers, peers, and even students to obtain if some area of research or some type of research problems are worth examining further. The researcher may personally encounter sparkling ideas while engaged in various tasks and problems relating to curriculum design, teaching-learning, assessment and evaluation, among others. This could, at the least, lead to conduct of some action-research which every teacher is required to undertake as a reflective practitioner/reflective professional. One’s own developmental work as also those of others get further disseminated in seminars and conferences which one should attend from time to time and tap recent development in the chosen field of research. Another source of encountering authentic and practical experience is interaction with the community and ascertaining any constraints faced by them. This may lead to further crystalisation of a research problem and research investigation.
Socio-Economic-Political-Technological Changes
As we remain alert in respect of what is happening around us, in our country as also globally, we encounter significant changes in social dynamics/social order, emergence of new social issues, economic upheavals in local markets as also in international trade, changes in political dynamics leading to changes in educational policies and regulations, and also changes in technology and especially ICT and social technologies and social networks. These changes both provide for ample research problems to further investigate as also enlighten and motivate the researcher to proceed to conduct a piece of research

Psychology

https://flyplugins.com/negative-reinforcement-examples-definition/
Sources of Research Problems
Ideas for research problems or topics can arise from a range of sources such as personal or professional experience, a theory, the media, or other research studies.
Personal or professional experience
Everyday personal or professional experience may lead us to identify a problem for which we would like a solution. Alternatively, we may encounter a question or questions that we would like to try and answer.
For example, on a personal level, you may prefer the taste of organically produced vegetables and thus wonder if people in general prefer the taste of organically produced vegetables to those produced non-organically. The research topic is a study into taste preferences and the question 'do people in general prefer the taste of organically produced vegetables to those produced non-organically?' Alternatively, for example, as a professional nature reserve warden you may want to encourage the establishment and spread of a particular plant species because you know it is a food source for a rare butterfly. The research problem may be, 'how do I encourage the spread of the plant species of interest?'
Theory
Theories are ideas about how things relate to each other. Theories may be general, commonly held beliefs (such as, domestic cats are the cause of a decline in bird numbers in UK gardens) or more technical ideas (for example, that global warming is causing a change to the timing of the seasonal responses of the flowering cherry tree in the UK).
There are many ways of expressing theories, some are very formal, others are informal. Here are some examples:
Keynes' statement that ... 'men are disposed as a rule and on average, to increase their consumption as their income increases, but not as much as the increase in their income ...' is a theory.
The idea that distance learners have different needs than on-campus students is a theory.
A hunch that crossing two particular strains of maize will produce a more drought-tolerant variety is a theory.
The assumption that every species has a fundamental niche, is a theory.
Theories may be useful in suggesting interesting questions and generally guiding fieldwork, but should not restrict us from exploring alternative explanations. The end result of the research process is knowledge.
Literature and the media
There are many sources of literature, such as books, journal articles, and newspapers. When searching and reading literature it is possible to encounter gaps in information and knowledge, and problems for which there is currently no solution. These may provide a good basis for research. We are also flooded with information presented by the media, such as television, which again might give rise to research ideas.

Statistics

Percentiles are a measure of the relative standing of observation within a data. Percentiles divide a set of observations into 100 equal parts, and percentile scores are frequently used to report results from national standardized tests such as NAT, GAT, etc.

The pth percentile is the value Y(p) in order statistic such that p percent of the values are less than the value Y(p) and (100-p) percent of the values are greater Y(p) . The 5th percentile is denoted by P5, the 10th by P10 and 95th by P95.

Percentiles for the ungrouped data
To calculate percentiles (a measure of the relative standing of an observation) for the ungrouped data, adopt the following procedure

Order the observation
For the mth percentile, determine the product m.n100. If m.n100 is not an integer, round it up and find the corresponding ordered value and if m.n100 is an integer, say k, then calculate the mean of the Kth and (k+1)th ordered observations.
Example: For the following height data collected from students find the 10th and 95th percentiles. 91, 89, 88, 87, 89, 91, 87, 92, 90, 98, 95, 97, 96, 100, 101, 96, 98, 99, 98, 100, 102, 99, 101, 105, 103, 107, 105, 106, 107, 112.

Solution: The ordered observations of the data are 87, 87, 88, 89, 89, 90, 91, 91, 92, 95, 96, 96, 97, 98, 98, 98, 99, 99, 100, 100, 101, 101, 102, 103, 105, 105, 106, 107, 107, 112.

P10=10×30100=3
So the 10th percentile i.e  P10 is 3rd observation in sorted data is 88, means that 10 percent of the observations in data set are less than 88.

P95=95×30100=28.5
29th observation is our 95th percentile i.e. P95=107.

Statistics

The cumulative percentage curve or ogive differs from the cumulative
frequency graph in that frequencies are expressed as cumulative percents
of N on the Y axis instead of as cumulative frequencies

Philosophy

योगश्चित्तवृत्तिनिरोध:
Yoga's chita virti nirodha, This sutra states that, "The practice of yoga controls the fluctuation (thought) of mind(Chitta)".
The cause of mind fluctuation are thoughts. 
These thoughts are very subtle and the root cause of all karma. These thoughts are the seeds which germinates many "EMOTIONS". These emotions influence the "DRISHTA"(Soul) to do "KARMA"(action). 
The Karma is itself a yog. We have to do karma for our existence. It is done by mind, speech and action. These karma return as the outcome of "Bhagya"(Destiny). 

The Destiny makes our personality. Our personality shows our "INDIVIDUALITY". This is a whole process which arises from a tiny thought. 

Yog is a journey of Sadhana that cleanse the mind, removes all the unnecessary thoughts over the mind to reach our original self. Yog cleanse every layers of thoughts one by one to express our original form "Dhrishta".

The Dhrishta is a pure form of being. It is free from all bondages of sorrow, emotions and pains. Yog expresses the true form of Dhrishta which is only happen when the thoughts are silence, calm and steady. Even if, The thoughts may steady for few minutes through yog. Yog naturally quiets the fluctuation the mind.

As we know, "As the mind so the being".  
When the mind is silent the being is able to feel itself and gain its true power of "ISHWARA".  
At last, There is a bridge between Dhrishta and Ishwara which we called  YOG. 
Hence, the yog bring control over the fluctuation of mind which is called "योगश्चित्तवृत्तिनिरोध:".(Dr. Manish Solanki) SHISHYAKULAM YOGA SHALA

Branches of philosophy

Metaphysics
Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that considers the physical universe and the nature of ultimate reality. It asks questions like, What is real? What is the origin of the world? What is beyond the stars? Your consideration of reality as an external creation or an internal construct can influence your metaphysical beliefs and perspectives and your teaching. Regardless of your definition of reality, the exploration and categorization of the physical universe form the foundation of several school subjects.
Epistemology
Epistemology is the branch of philosophy that considers how people come to learn what they know.
Derived from the Greek word episteme, meaning knowledge or understanding, epistemology refers to the nature and origin of knowledge and truth. Epistemology proposes that there are four main bases of knowledge: divine revelation, experience, logic and reason, and intuition. These influence how teaching, learning, and understanding come about in the classroom.
Axiology
Axiology is the branch of philosophy that considers the study of principles and values. These values are divided into two main kinds: ethics and aesthetics. Ethics is the questioning of morals and personal values. Aesthetics is the examination of what is beautiful, enjoyable, or tasteful. In axiology education is more than just about knowledge but also quality of life.
Logic
INTRODUCTION

       Great men leave behind them a scintillating trail of their glorious deeds which inspire the coming generations. India is fortunate to be the birthplace of eminent sons like Mahatma Gandhi, Rabindranath   Tagore ,Aurobindo Ghose, swami Vivekananda and  a galaxy of others ,each of  whom in his own way, tried to raise the  name of the motherland to such spiritual heights not known  before in the   history  of the  country since the advent of the British.

            No doubt, geniuses are born. But the flowering of the multifaceted personality of Rabindranath Tagore was the result of interaction of a variety of favorable environmental factors in producing the genius. The contribution of Rabindranath Tagore in this respect as well as in other fields, especially in education, has been paramount. In the galaxy of modern educational thinkers the name of Rebindranath Tagore, popularly known as “Gurudev”, is famous not only in our country for his contribution in the field of education, but all over the world. One of the most striking features of his educational thinking is that he considered education as the most effective tool for modernizing Indian agricultural.

Tagore; A Brief Life Sketch

          The myriad minded genius and Asia’s first Nobel Laureate, Rabindranath Tagore is the philosopher who imprinted some thought providing ideas on my mind. Tagore was born on 7th may 1861 in Calcutta as the fourteenth son of Maharishi Devendranath. He had early education at home by a tutor. He attended University College in London, but returned before completing his studies. He developed taste for English literature and he was only twenty when his first collection of poems was published. His writings include more than one thousand poems and two thousand songs in addition to a large number of novels, short stories, dramas and philosophical tests. It was at the age of forty that he started a school of his own in Bengal. In this school he gave name and local habitation to his dynamic idealism. The school known as Shantiniketan Ashram, became in 1921 the world famous Vishwaharati a seat of International University seeking to develop a basis on which the culture of the east and west may meet in common fellowship.

          In 1909 his world famous work Gitanjali was published and he went to England in1912 with it. Next year he was   awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature. The Calcutta and the oxford university’s conferring honored him by conferring on him the honorary degree of doctorate.  He made notable contributions to religious and educational thought, politics and social reform, moral regeneration and economic reconstruction. Thus Gurudev, the poet Laureate of India, a great thinker, philosopher and a teacher, staunch patriot, and above all a noble heart who lived the whole humanity- a perfect man the bard of Bengal died on 7th August, 1941                               

TAGORE’S PHILOSOPHY

Philosophy of Humanism: Tagore observed, “The best and noblest gifts of humanity cannot be the monopoly, of a particular race or country”.

Synthesis of culture:  Tagore said, before we are in a position to stand in comparison with the other cultures of the world or try to cooperate with them. We must bare our own culture on a synthesis   of all the different cultures we have.

True culture: Culture brings fulfillment from the depths of the self to the faculties and aptitudes of a man as a whole; under its influence man spontaneously attains an all-round fulfillment and the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake and the enthusiasm for unselfish action become natural. True culture sets greater store by natural courtesy than mechanical observance of custom and convention. A cultured man will rather injure than humiliate himself. To be envious of others success is to humiliate himself.

Tagore – A Universalist: As a messenger of freedom of mind and peace, Tagore has expressed his feelings in the following verses.

“Where the mind is without fear

And the head is held high,

Where knowledge is free.

Where the world has not been broken in to

Fragments by narrow domestic walls,

…….        ………            …….

Into that heaven of freedom, my father

Let my country awake”


 MAJOR IDEAS OF TAGORE

       I am deeply influenced by the mystical and spiritual overtones underneath Tagore’s writings especially of “Gitanjali” with its lyricism and untranslatable delicacies. It is his own perception of life that is reflected in his creative works and philosophical and educational ideas. As a naturalist he gave importance to nature. In his view, both man and nature are the creations of one and the same God. This will naturally strengthen spiritual relationships between the two. Thus his naturalism was different from the one advocated by Rousseau. The different thought being that Tagore’s naturalism was based on humanism. Love and       harmony among all the things that exist in nature was the basis of his philosophy.      


          Tagore was a realist and an idealist too. According to Dr.Ratha Krishnan, the soul of ancient India is mirrored in Tagore’s writings. It embodies all the ancient ideals of religion, philosophy and art. As a true religious in spirit, his spiritual journey was guided by the Upanishads, the traditional Hindu spiritual scriptures. He speaks of the immanent Brahman, the supreme reality, an all – suffusing force that transcends personality and any sort of description. The idea is that all things in the cosmos are only temporal manifestations of Brahman. Tagore exhorts, let us find god, let us live for the ultimate truth which emancipates us from the bondage of the dust and gives as the wealth, not of things but of inner urge, not of power, but of love”.


           An implicit philosophy can be seen in Tagore’s poetry. The main literary device by means of which Tagore communicated his religio – philosophical views was that of bridal mysticism. The entails seeing oneself as the bride of God with a submission to and adoration of the divine bridegroom. A powerful Hindu thinker, his Upanishadic notions permeate his works and he has been elevated in the minds of Indians to a sort of poet – sage.


          According to Tagore, the aim of education is self realization. It means the realization of universal soul in one’s self. It is a process which cannot be realized without education. He synthesizes the ancient Vedantic traditions with the modern western scientific attitude in formulating the goal of education.


TAGORE’S VIEWS ON DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF EDUCATION

          The aim of education according to Tagore is creative self expression through physical, mental, aesthetic and moral development. He stressed the need for developing empathy and sensitivity and the necessity for an intimate relationship with one’s cultural and natural environment. He saw education as a vehicle for appreciating the richest aspects of other cultures, while maintaining one’s own cultural specificity.

1.  Meaning of education: Education is short of the highest purpose of man, the fullest growth and freedom of soul. To the child, the environment will provide an ever-ready back ground for its spontaneous activity. Our true education is possible only in the forest through intimate correct with nature.                       

2.  Freedom of mind: The objective of education is the freedom of mind, which can only be achieved through the path of education.

3.  Children as children: It is a mistake to judge by the standards of grownups. Adults ignore the gifts of children and insist that children must learn through the same process as they do. This man’s most cruel and most wasteful mistake. Children’s subconscious mind is more active than their conscious intelligence.

4.  Discipline and Freedom: Living ideals cannot be set into clockwork arrangement. Tagore wrote, I never said to them; don’t do this, or don’t do that……. I never punish them.            

          An ideal school is an Ashram where men have gathered for the highest end of life. Tagore observed to give spiritual culture to our boys was my principal objective in starting my school at Bolepur.

5.  Living contact between the teacher and the taught:  In teaching, the guiding should be personal love based on human relations. In education, the teacher is more important than the method. The teacher is Guru. He is to guide and stimulate the students. He remarked, a teacher can never truly teach unless he is still learning himself. A lamb can   never light another lamb unless it continues to burn in its own flame. So a teacher must always be teacher.


TAGORE’S CONTRIBUTION TO MODERN EDUCATION                    

         Tagore    was   fully dissatisfied with   the prevalent system of education at that time and called the schools as factories of role learning. Then he advocated         the principle of freedom for an effective education. He said that the children should be given freedom so that they are able to grow and develop as per their own wishes. A man through the process of education should be able to come out as a harmonious individual in time with his social set-up of life. He suggested creative self- expression through craft, music, drawing and drama.

                                              

          Tagore’s major contribution to modern education is the establishment of shantinikethan at Bolepur, in 1901.the school which was modeled on the ancient ashrams grew into a world university called Viswa Bharati. It is an abode of peace where teachers and students live together in a spirit of perfect comradeship. The motto of the institution is’ where the whole world forms its one single nest. It has open spaces and atmosphere of freedom surrounded by natural environment. It is open to, all irrespective of country, race, religion, or politics. It is centered around simple living and high thinking and has spiritual and religious atmosphere.


                   Tagore advocated teaching while talking as the best method and stressed on tours and excursions. He supported teaching and learning through   debates and discussions which develop the power of clear-cut thinking. He adopted activity method which makes the learner physically sound. He also held heuristic method where the student is in the position of a discoverer. He stressed on free environment which makes learner self- disciplined.


                   In Tagore’ philosophy of education, the aesthetic development of the sense was us important as the intellectual; and music; literature; art, and dance were given great prominence in the daily life of the school.                  


                    

SANTHINIKETAN AND VISWA BHARATHI

              As an alternative to the existing forms of education, he started A small School of education in 1901.later this school was developed into a university and rural reconstruction centre, known as Viswa Bharati, where he tried to develop an alternative model of education that stemmed from his own learning experience. Students at Santhiniketan were encouraged to create their own publications and put out several illustrated magazines. The children were encouraged to follow their ideas in painting and drawing and to draw inspirations from the many visiting artists and writers. The main characteristics of the Santhiniketan School are the following.    

·        It is a community school where there is no distinction of caste and creed.

·        Co-educational and residential institution.

·        It is a self governing institution – has a dairy farm ,post office ,hospital and workshop.

·         It is based on the concept of freedom of the mind.

·        Mother tongue is the medium of instruction.

·        It is studied in natural surroundings and it provides for manual labor.

·        There is well- equipped library.                    

          Rabindranath Tagore envisioned as a learning centre where conflicting interests are minimized, where individuals work together in common pursuit of truth and realize that artists in all parts of the world have created forms of beauty, scientists discovered the secrets of the universe, philosophers solved the problems of existence, saints made the truth of the spiritual world organic in their own lives, not merely for some particular race to which they belong, but for all mankind.


Tagore’s concept of a teacher

             In Tagore’s educational philosophy we observe the infusion of traditionalism and modernism, orientalism as well as western thought. His concept of a teacher was not an exception to the very fact. On the one hand he wanted the ‘guru’ to be an ideal and authority for his disciples, on the other hand he wanted a teacher to be a stage - setter or facilitator as the modern educationalist also suggest.


         A teacher according to Tagore’s concept is continuously a learner who is dynamic in his efforts to know the unknown and to let it be known to others.


         Ravindranath condemn any teacher who had lost the desire to know and learn and only mechanically repeated his lessons.  He said, “if the teacher does not himself posses learning how can he impact to be others? The teacher, who merely repeats bookish information mechanically, can never teach anything and can never inspire, and without proper inspiration independent creative faculties can never develop”.


             Thus, Ravindranath offered a highly dignified and responsible role to teachers.


 RELEVANCE OF TAGORE’S EDUCATIONAL THOUGHTS IN   INDIAN EDUCATION

                Tagore is critical of the prevalent   system of education which lays role emphasis upon bookish learning. The intellectual aim of education, according to him, is the development of the intellectual faculties’ which should be developed through education. These are the power of thinking and of imagination.


          Tagore’s educational ideas have been shared by other educationists and many of his innovations have now become part of general educational practices, but his special contribution lay in the emphasis on harmony balance and total development of personality.


           The visionary and the great educationist in Tagore solved the problem of today as far back as fifty years. Economic forces compel the teachers of today to look for pupils, but in the natural order of ting it is the pupil who should look for the teacher.  The teacher student relationship designed by Tagore is a model in this context. It became one of earliest coeducational programs in South Asia. It’s establishment led to pioneering efforts in many directions, including model for Indian higher education and mass education as well as pan Asian and global cultural exchange. As one of the earliest educators to think in terms of the global   village, Tagore’s educational model has a unique sensitivity and aptness for education within multi-racial, multi-lingual and multi-cultural situations amidst conditions of acknowledged economic discrepancy, political imbalance and social evils.


A CRITIQUE OF TAGORE.

          Rabindranath Tagore, in his own person was a living icon of the type of mutuality and creative exchange that he advocated. He deliberated on different problems of Indian society particularly that of the rural people and tried to remove them through education. His educational system was a synthesis of East and West, Ancient and Modern, Science and Vedanta although he protested against the emphasis on foreign language. He was one of the first Indian to argue for a humane educational system that was in touch with the environment and aimed at over-all development of educational system on essential human virtues like freedom, purity, sympathy, perfection and world brotherhood.


CONCLUSION

       Rabindnathra Tagore, by his efforts and achievements, is part of a global network of pioneering educators such as Rousseau, Pestalozzi, Frobel, Montessori, Dewey and in the contemporary context, Malcolm Knowles. Although Tagore is a superb representative of his country –the man who wrote its national anthem, he is truly a man of the whole earth, a product of the best of both traditionals Indian and modern western cultures. The core of Tagore’s educational philosophy was learning from nature, music and life. He created Sanhiniketan to realize his educational ideals. This is the reason why his education is easily acceptable by human mind. Tagore extended the meaning and functional importance of certain aspects of personality as nobody else had done before him. The ideal educator must combine in himself the gifts of a philosopher, a poet, a mystic, a social reformer, a scientist and a veritable man of action  can he has to take into account all types of men  and their aspirations ,all facets of the human personality, all levels man’s experience, all fields of endeavor and achievement.

Philosophy


HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHIES
John Dewey Biography
Philosopher and Educator
Written by Kendra Cherry Updated on July 04, 2018
"I believe that education, therefore, is a process of living and not a preparation for future living." - John Dewey, My Pedagogic Creed (1897)

Major Contributions
John Dewey was an American philosopher and educator who helped found pragmatism, a philosophical school of thought that was popular at the beginning of the 20th century. He was also instrumental in the progressive movement in education, strongly believing that the best education involves learning through doing.

Life
John Dewey was born October 20, 1859, in Burlington, Vermont. He died June 1, 1952, in New York City, New York.

Career
John Dewey graduated from the University of Vermont and spent three years as a high school teacher in Oil City, Pennsylvania. He then spent a year studying under the guidance of G. Stanley Hall at John Hopkins University in America's first psychology lab. After earning his Ph.D. from John Hopkins, Dewey went on to teach at the University of Michigan for nearly a decade.


In 1894, Dewey accepted a position as the chairman of the department of philosophy, psychology, and pedagogy at the University of Chicago. It was at the University of Chicago that Dewey began to formalize his views that would contribute so heavily to the school of thought known as pragmatism. The central tenant of pragmatism is that the value, truth or meaning of an idea lies in its practical consequences. Dewey also helped establish the University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, where he was able to directly apply his pedagogical theories.

Dewey eventually left the University of Chicago and became a professor of philosophy at Columbia University from 1904 until his retirement in 1930. In 1905, he became President of the American Psychological Association.

Contributions to Psychology
Dewey's work had a vital influence on psychology, education, and philosophy and he is often considered one of the greatest thinkers of the 20th century. His emphasis on progressive education has contributed greatly to the use of experimentation rather than an authoritarian approach to knowledge. Dewey was also a prolific writer, publishing over 1,000 books, essays, and articles on a wide range of subjects including education, art, nature, philosophy, religion, culture, ethics and democracy over his 65-year writing career.

Educational Philosophy
Dewey firmly believed that education should not just be teachers making students learn mindless facts that they would soon forget. He thought it should be a journey of experiences, building upon each other to create and understand new experiences.


Dewey also felt that schools tried to create a world separate from students' lives. School activities and the life experiences of the students should be connected, Dewey believed, or else real learning would be impossible. Cutting students off from their psychological ties, i.e., society and family, would make their learning journeys less meaningful and thereby make learning less memorable. Likewise, schools also needed to prepare students for life in society by socializing them. 

Selected Publications
The School and Society (1900)
The Child and the Curriculum (1902)
How We Think (1910)
Experience and Nature (1925)
Philosophy and Civilization (1931)
Knowing and the Known (1949)
 Share
 Flip
 Email
 Text
Was this page helpful?

Article Sources
Related Articles

The Life and Theories of Psychologist William James

G. Stanley Hall's Important Contributions to Psychology


Explore the Life and Theories of Carl Rogers

Jean Piaget's Life and Contributions to Psychology

Wilhelm Wundt Profile: The Father of Psychology

Biography of Influential Psychologist Clark Hull

Who Is Credited for the World's First Experimental Psychology Lab?

Who Was Psychologist and Philosopher Erich Fromm?

Why Lev Vygotsky Was One of the Most Influential Psychologists

From 1878 to Today: A Timeline of History of Modern Psyc

Philosophy


Education’s Impact on Individualism

Julie Melnyk - Student
Jun 5, 2017 · 4 min read
Educational purpose of each individual student is to grow and develop into the most successful they can be. The American education system challenges individuality yet is needed to expand knowledge in our students.
Education, on a specific scale, is given to students who stare blankly back at teachers who drone on about semi-useless topics, they most likely have no interest in. The blank faced students all are the same. The education system has rigged them all to act, think, and talk the same.
The social normality of a student is to wake up bright an early, before our biological clock even has a chance to cope, maybe down a few cups of coffee if time allows. Then drag themselves into whatever transportation is available to conduct them to school. After about seven hours of brain draining work, they maybe have the chance to participate in sports, clubs and activities after classes. The daily grind leaves little time to hang out with friends like an average kid could do, impacting social connections. When the days over, students are exhausted. Education can be good if enforced upon children effectively however if not, can result in negative consequences for both the student and teacher.
Talk to almost any American student and they’ll say “School is prison”. But maybe not like that exactly because they’re too polite. Or they’ve already been brainwashed by the system to think that school is their second home. Students are made to tiptoe around the idea that school is prison, to be careful what they say. Ironically in both school and prison, the inmate must comply to all rules or face consequences if broken.
In America, children are given the opportunity to attend school for a public education. Being educated, even on simple theorem is a gift not everyone has access to. Yet our students still cannot fathom a likeable idea of school.
The task is to find out why students whom given the opportunities they have, the ability to be so lucky to hold an education, start to loose the drive to further their education. Why don’t kids like school? It’s not because they’re taking the education system for granted but that the system is taking our students for granted.
The system does this by never getting a full understanding of their student’s cognitive principles. They don’t learn what they like or what interest them. The education systems assumes they can find one way to morph their students early on in education so that they remain easily teachable for generations.
Education, defined by Google, is an enlightening experience. The broad term leaves room to discover and explore all ideas and expressions, without limitations. However on a smaller, more local scale, education to students is just simply learning to learn. Learning the same concepts and ideas as the generations before. Learning skills, that each student poses, forming that perfect, cookie cutter student.
The skills we gain as students do not vary. The skills taught in English class are the same taught in History, even Algebra. It is all based around the idea of problem solving. Find the problem, identify it, think about it for a few, then solve it. But when every student is taught the same skills, there is no room for variation or creative work to strive. Not to bash the skills taught in school, because they are important to be taught no matter the level of intelligence a person has. However students are never encouraged to go at the problem their own way, discover a way that works for them as an individual.
The example of the five paragraph essay model demonstrates this. From a young age, students are forced to write with only five paragraphs, if they go beyond, they do not meet the standards and could flunk just for a creative risk. The essay model makes all students write the same. Sure this is great when it comes to time constraints, like getting 100 papers graded by a deadline, but it limits creativity. Teaching methods do not stimulate innovation

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Trends and issues

Open-source software (OSS) is a type of computer software in which source code is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to study, change, and distribute the software to anyone and for any purpose.[1] Open-source software may be developed in a collaborative public manner. Open-source software is a prominent example of open collaboration.[2]

Open-source software development can bring in diverse perspectives beyond those of a single company. A 2008 report by the Standish Group stated that adoption of open-source software models have resulted in savings of about $60 billion (£48 billion) per year for consumers.[3][4]

History Edit
Further information: History of free and open-source software
End of 1990s: Foundation of the Open Source Initiative Edit
In the early days of computing, programmers and developers shared software in order to learn from each other and evolve the field of computing. Eventually, the open-source notion moved to the way side of commercialization of software in the years 1970–1980. However, academics still often developed software collaboratively. For example, Donald Knuth in 1979 with the TeX typesetting system[5] or Richard Stallman in 1983 with the GNU operating system.[6] In 1997, Eric Raymond published The Cathedral and the Bazaar, a reflective analysis of the hacker community and free-software principles. The paper received significant attention in early 1998, and was one factor in motivating Netscape Communications Corporation to release their popular Netscape Communicator Internet suite as free software. This source code subsequently became the basis behind SeaMonkey, Mozilla Firefox, Thunderbird and KompoZer.

Netscape's act prompted Raymond and others to look into how to bring the Free Software Foundation's free software ideas and perceived benefits to the commercial software industry. They concluded that FSF's social activism was not appealing to companies like Netscape, and looked for a way to rebrand the free software movement to emphasize the business potential of sharing and collaborating on software source code.[7] The new term they chose was "open source", which was soon adopted by Bruce Perens, publisher Tim O'Reilly, Linus Torvalds, and others. The Open Source Initiative was founded in February 1998 to encourage use of the new term and evangelize open-source principles.[8]

While the Open Source Initiative sought to encourage the use of the new term and evangelize the principles it adhered to, commercial software vendors found themselves increasingly threatened by the concept of freely distributed software and universal access to an application's source code. A Microsoft executive publicly stated in 2001 that "open source is an intellectual property destroyer. I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business."[9] However, while Free and open-source software has historically played a role outside of the mainstream of private software development, companies as large as Microsoft have begun to develop official open-source presences on the Internet. IBM, Oracle, Google and State Farm are just a few of the companies with a serious public stake in today's competitive open-source market. There has been a significant shift in the corporate philosophy concerning the development of FOSS.[10]

The free-software movement was launched in 1983. In 1998, a group of individuals advocated that the term free software should be replaced by open-source software (OSS) as an expression which is less ambiguous[11][12][13] and more comfortable for the corporate world.[14] Software developers may want to publish their software with an open-source license, so that anybody may also develop the same software or understand its internal functioning. With open-source software, generally anyone is allowed to create modifications of it, port it to new operating systems and instruction set architectures, share it with others or, in some cases, market it. Scholars Casson and Ryan have pointed out several policy-based reasons for adoption of open source – in particular, the heightened value proposition from open source (when compared to most proprietary formats) in the following categories:

Security
Affordability
Transparency
Perpetuity
Interoperability
Flexibility
Localization – particularly in the context of local governments (who make software decisions). Casson and Ryan argue that "governments have an inherent responsibility and fiduciary duty to taxpayers" which includes the careful analysis of these factors when deciding to purchase proprietary software or implement an open-source option.[15]
The Open Source Definition presents an open-source philosophy and further defines the terms of use, modification and redistribution of open-source software. Software licenses grant rights to users which would otherwise be reserved by copyright law to the copyright holder. Several open-source software licenses have qualified within the boundaries of the Open Source Definition. The most prominent and popular example is the GNU General Public License (GPL), which "allows free distribution under the condition that further developments and applications are put under the same licence", thus also free.[16]

The open source label came out of a strategy session held on April 7, 1998 in Palo Alto in reaction to Netscape's January 1998 announcement of a source code release for Navigator (as Mozilla). A group of individuals at the session included Tim O'Reilly, Linus Torvalds, Tom Paquin, Jamie Zawinski, Larry Wall, Brian Behlendorf, Sameer Parekh, Eric Allman, Greg Olson, Paul Vixie, John Ousterhout, Guido van Rossum, Philip Zimmermann, John Gilmore and Eric S. Raymond.[17] They used the opportunity before the release of Navigator's source code to clarify a potential confusion caused by the ambiguity of the word "free" in English.

Many people claimed that the birth of the Internet, since 1969, started the open-source movement, while others do not distinguish between open-source and free software movements.[18]

The Free Software Foundation (FSF), started in 1985, intended the word "free" to mean freedom to distribute (or "free as in free speech") and not freedom from cost (or "free as in free beer"). Since a great deal of free software already was (and still is) free of charge, such free software became associated with zero cost, which seemed anti-commercial.[7]

The Open Source Initiative (OSI) was formed in February 1998 by Eric Raymond and Bruce Perens. With at least 20 years of evidence from case histories of closed software development versus open development already provided by the Internet developer community, the OSI presented the "open source" case to commercial businesses, like Netscape. The OSI hoped that the use of the label "open source", a term suggested by Christine Peterson[6][19] of the Foresight Institute at the strategy session, would eliminate ambiguity, particularly for individuals who perceive "free software" as anti-commercial. They sought to bring a higher profile to the practical benefits of freely available source code, and they wanted to bring major software businesses and other high-tech industries into open source. Perens attempted to register "open source" as a service mark for the OSI, but that attempt was impractical by trademark standards. Meanwhile, due to the presentation of Raymond's paper to the upper management at Netscape—Raymond only discovered when he read the press release,[20] and was called by Netscape CEO Jim Barksdale's PA later in the day—Netscape released its Navigator source code as open source, with favorable results.[21]

Philosophy

DEMOCRACY AND EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS



DEMOCRACY:


Democracy in its  purest or most ideal form would be a society in which all adult citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy is usually considered as “the government of the people, by the people and for the people”
                According to Henderson, “democracy is based on two assumptions: the infinite value and worth of human personality and belief that men are capable of managing their own affairs in such a way as to promote the welfare of all and that, therefore, they should have the freedom to do so”
                The term democracy come from the Greek word “demokratia” meaning “rule of the people”  which was coined from “demos” meaning “people” and “kratos” meaning “power”. The word democracy on the one hand, points towards the type of the government and on the other way a way of life.
                In a democratic government there are provided free opportunities for the self expression to an individual. Dewey is of the opinion that in democracy besides the form of the government something else is involved. This is mainly the way of life for good living which is based on experience. Bode considers democracy as “a way of life” and by way of life he means “a determining influence in every major area of life”
                From the political point of view, democracy means “the government of the people, by the people and for the people”. In democracy the government is formed by the majority but the rights of the minority are not ignored.
                In the economic sphere democracy means that each individual should be given freedom to earn his own living through his own efforts.
                Democracy is taken in the social sense, when there are no impediments in the progress of any race, class or religion. The meaning of this is that for all the people there should be equal opportunities so that they may become good citizens.
PRE-CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESSFUL DEMOCRACY:-
                Democracy believes in giving independence to the people. But if the people are not educated and are not discipline for social good then this independence would be very costly and would take the form of anarchy. For the success of democracy some pre conditions are very necessary. They are,
1.       There should be economic betterment of the people. Democracy cannot be established on the hungry stomachs of the people.
2.       The second pre condition is the formation of an educated electorate. Democracy can function properly when the people are educated and they are conscious of their rights and duties.
EDUCATION FOR DEMOCRACY:-
For the success of democracy it is essential that each individual owns his responsibilities consciously and this will be possible only when the individuals power of understanding is high and he is of  good character. It is the duty of the society that it should prepare the individual from intellectual moral and physical point of view to discharge hi duties of citizenship. So that the society may remain happy and rich. The main features of education are usually sited as two fold. Firstly, it is to transmit the social and cultural heritage to the new generation. (example through schools). The second function of education is to create among the students a feeling of adjustment to the environment. The school should develop all the qualities among the children which are desirable in a good citizen. This qualities includes,
1.       Self realization
2.       Human relationship
3.       Economic efficiency
4.       Civic responsibility
True education for democracy should help the people to appreciate the urgent necessity of acquiring knowledge to discriminate between facts and prejudices, to weigh and judge efficiencies, to arrive at conclusions.
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL AGENCIES FOR DEMOCRATIC EDUCATION:-
    �

Philosophy

SOCIALISM AND EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS

Introduction:

The word socialism was first used during the early years of the 19th century but many philosophers and reformers in the past expressed this resentment against inequalities in society and proposed the concept of an egalitarian society. But no pragmatic programs were put forwarded by them during this period. The French revolution of 1789 with its promise of equality provided a new impetus to socialist ideas. It was during the beginning of industrial revolution that the socialist ideas began to emerge as distinct and powerful concept. It was during the early decade of the 19th century the powerful socialist ideas developed different parts of France. St.Simon, Charles Furrier, Robert Owen, Louis Blanc and others proposed their ideas of socialism and Marx and Engels put forwarded their theory of Socialism and communism during the later half of the 19th century.
                Most of the systems were Utopian which were not supported by powerful movement and strong theoretical background. But Marx and Engels attacked the Utopian ideas through their works and uphold the course of scientific socialism. Through the theory and class struggle and dialetic materialism, they believed that socialism is a historic necessity. They not only provided the theoretical back ground for socialism and communism but actively involved in the formation of working class organization in the different part of Europe.
                Socialism is a political economical theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
                In some respects it differs from communism. In fact the goal of the both is the same, ie the establishment of classless society, but there is a difference in them regarding the means of realizing the goal. Communism wants to establish a socialistic society through force or revolution. It does not accept the dialectism and materialism of communism. It believes in liberalism and idealism.
                Like communism, socialism is also against capitalism. But instead of snatching the capital from the capitalists it wants to persuade them intelligently to give up the same in democratic manner in favour of the general people. It stands for a mixed economy. It wants that the means of production  should be equitably distributed amongst all. It does not want that a major portion of the national income should go in the hands of a few. It wants that the state should control the big industries but at the same time private enterprises, too, should be allowed to exist. In the same way it does not want to abolish the rights of private property, but it wants to reorganize and delimit.
                The socialism believes in the power of ballets in place of bullets. It strives to win freedom for the workers through the majority vote in their favours. Socialism wants to establish a welfare state in order that each one may get equal opportunity for development. It stands for individual liberty. It does not want to impose any measure which may be hindrance in the individual freedom. In this respect it believes in democratic methods. It recognizes the importance of manual labour and wants to improve the conditions of labourers both in rural and urban areas. It does not stands for the rules of the working class, but wants the government elected through the popular votes.
Main features of Socialism:
1.       Socialism aims at establishing a classless society
2.       Socialism aims at social justice, equality and the complete supremacy of the state
3.       Socialism aims at abolishing the capitalist system
4.       It aims at the active participation of the individual in the productive process of the society
5.       It has little faith in the religious ideas and faith
6.       Socialism ignores spiritual values
Indian concept of Socialism:
                Gandhiji, Jawaharlal Nehru, Jaiprakash Narayan, are the greatest supporters of socialism. Gandhiji saw socialism as a wa